Agent-neutral
Support the experiences teams choose instead of forcing every workflow into a proprietary chat or builder.
Why Onterix
Enterprises will use multiple model vendors, coding agents, search products, employee assistants, and internal applications. Onterix is being built as the shared capability and data boundary underneath them.
Above raw integration runtimes. Below employee-facing agent applications. Alongside the controls enterprises already trust.
The reason to exist
MCP is a powerful interoperability wedge, but the enduring problem is larger: connecting a principal, client, source, destination, policy, data treatment, approval, and outcome in one governed transaction.
Support the experiences teams choose instead of forcing every workflow into a proprietary chat or builder.
Project one capability runtime through MCP, CLI, native APIs, SDKs, workflows, and future adapters.
Compose with enterprise identity, DLP, KMS, storage, model gateways, policy, and SIEM rather than pretending to replace them.
Keep sensitive execution in a managed cell, dedicated environment, customer data plane, or self-hosted installation as requirements demand.
What we are not
Onterix can coexist with the products that own employee search, agent UX, workflow automation, identity, and data-loss prevention.
Onterix is infrastructure underneath agent experiences, not a requirement to replace Glean-, Onyx-, or model-vendor-facing UX.
Onterix supplies agent-aware enforcement points and composes customer-selected detection and transformation providers.
Proxying and basic OAuth are becoming table stakes. The product value is the shared execution, data, approval, and evidence boundary.
Build the category with us
We are looking for teams willing to pressure-test the boundary with real workflows, controls, and deployment constraints.